Travel the world on fifteen damn dollars
Why I don't believe in affiliate marketing
I'm Rach!

I’m a former wedding planner who traded big events for helping women course creators, summit hosts, and podcasters build thriving communities. Fueled by coffee and sweet tea, my mission is to provide heartfelt guidance, actionable strategies, and a whole lot of vision to help you do the darn thing—launch that podcast, host that summit, or grow that course community—with confidence and heart!

hi friend,

🎧 Listen: Apple, Spotify


How to know if your community idea will actually work before you build the whole thing

Here’s what most people do when they have a community idea. They plan. They map out every detail. They pick the platform, outline the content calendar, design the welcome sequence, create the pricing tiers. They build the entire infrastructure. And then they launch.

And… nothing. Radio silence. Tumbleweeds.

Or worse, a handful of people join and immediately ghost. And they’re left sitting there thinking, what did I miss? Why didn’t this work? I did everything right.

Except they skipped the one thing that actually mattered: validation.

The Validation Gap

Let me tell you what I see happen constantly in this industry. Someone has an idea for a community. Maybe it came from their own experience. Maybe they saw someone else do something similar. Maybe they’re hearing the same questions from clients over and over. And they think, this would be perfect. I should build a community around this.

So they do what they’ve been taught to do. They spend weeks, sometimes months, building out the member journey. They create the onboarding sequence. They film welcome videos. They design graphics. They write copy for the sales page. They set up the tech. They integrate everything. They build the funnels.

And then they launch. And three people join. Or twenty people join but the community stays silent. Or fifty people join during the launch promo and forty-eight of them cancel after the first month.

The problem wasn’t the platform. It wasn’t the price point. It wasn’t even the content. The problem was they never validated that people actually wanted this in the first place.

What Validation Actually Means

Validation is not posting on Instagram asking if people would join. It’s not getting DMs from three people saying omg yes. It’s not looking at someone else’s successful community and assuming yours will work the same way. And it’s definitely not thinking that because you would have wanted this three years ago, other people want it now.

That’s not validation. That’s hope wearing a research hat.

Real validation means you’ve tested the demand. You’ve put something out there, something real, something people can actually experience, and you’ve watched what happens. Do people show up? Do they engage? Do they ask for more? Do they pull out their credit cards? That’s validation.

And here’s why most people skip it: because it feels scary. It feels vulnerable. It feels like you’re showing people an unfinished version of something you haven’t perfected yet. But that’s exactly the point. You’re supposed to test before you perfect. You’re supposed to see if demand exists before you invest in polish, because polish doesn’t create demand. Polish just makes something that already works look better.

The Validation Framework

Before you can validate a community idea, you need to know exactly what problem you’re solving. Not what problem you think you’re solving, but what problem your people are actually experiencing. The only way to know that is to listen. Really listen.

Go back through your DMs. Look at your email inbox. Check your discovery call notes. Read the comments on your posts. What questions keep coming up? What struggles are people talking about? You’re looking for patterns, not one-off requests. If five people have asked you the same question in different ways, that’s a pattern. If multiple clients are hitting the same roadblock, that’s a pattern. Those patterns are your signal.

And here’s what most people get wrong: they spot the pattern and immediately jump to building the solution. But you’re not done yet. You need to test if the pattern you’re seeing is actually a problem people want help solving, because sometimes people complain about something but they’re not actually willing to do anything about it. Sometimes they say they want community but what they really want is direct access to you. You won’t know until you test.

Testing With a Live Experience

This is where most people get nervous, because testing means putting something out there before it’s perfect. It means showing up and delivering something real before you have all the answers figured out. But that’s the entire point. You’re not testing your ability to deliver a polished product. You’re testing if people actually want what you think they want.

So you create a short-term, focused experience. A workshop. A sprint. A challenge. A beta cohort. Something time-bound that delivers real value around the topic you’re considering building a full community around. And then you watch what happens.

Do people sign up? That’s your first signal. If you put out a free five-day workshop and nobody registers, that’s telling you something. Do people show up? That’s your second signal. If fifty people register but only eight actually attend day one, that’s data. Do people engage? If people show up but they’re lurking and not participating, that’s important information. Do people ask for more? If you finish the workshop and people are sliding into your DMs saying when can we keep going or is there a paid version of this, congratulations. You’ve validated demand.

If they don’t ask for more, you just saved yourself months of work.

Reading the Signals Correctly

Running a test experience is only half the battle. The other half is actually reading the signals correctly, and most people miss the signals. They see what they want to see instead of what’s actually happening.

If you launch a free workshop and get a hundred registrations but only ten people show up on day one, that’s telling you something. Either your messaging attracted the wrong people, or your topic isn’t urgent enough for people to prioritize. Don’t make excuses. Don’t say well, people are busy. Of course people are busy. But when something feels essential, they make it work. If your show-up rate is below forty percent, you’ve got a messaging problem or a relevance problem, and you need to fix that before you build a paid community.

Pay attention to engagement consistency. Are the same people showing up every single day? Or are you seeing different faces each time? If it’s the same core group participating throughout the entire experience, that’s a great sign. Those are your future members. If you’re seeing high turnover, different people every day, lots of drop-off after day two, that’s telling you the topic has initial appeal but isn’t sticky enough for ongoing engagement.

Watch for peer-to-peer interaction. In communities, the magic isn’t in the content you deliver. The magic is in the connections people make with each other. If people are only there for your teaching, they want a course, not a community. Are people asking each other questions? Are they offering feedback? Are they sharing their own experiences? If yes, you’re onto something. If no, you might be building a course with a community wrapper, and that’s going to create retention problems later.

The Most Important Signal

At the end of your test experience, do people ask what comes next? Do they want to keep going? Do they say I don’t want this to end? If multiple people are asking how they can continue, congratulations. You’ve validated demand.

But here’s the key: they have to ask. You don’t ask them. You don’t pitch them on the next step. You don’t say so I’m thinking about creating a membership, would you join? That’s leading the witness. That doesn’t tell you anything real.

You finish the experience. You deliver massive value. And then you see who reaches out wanting more. Those people are your founding members. Those are the ones who will actually pay and stay.

Why Testing Actually Speeds You Up

I know what some of you are thinking. This sounds great, but I don’t have time to run a whole test experience. I just want to launch the community. And I get it. Testing feels like it’s slowing you down. It feels like an extra step when you just want to build the thing and start making money.

But testing doesn’t slow you down. It speeds you up. Because skipping validation means you might build something nobody wants, and when that happens, you’ve just wasted three months of your life. Testing means you spend two weeks finding out if the idea has legs before you invest two hundred hours building it out. That’s not slow. That’s smart.

And here’s the beautiful part about testing: even if you discover the idea doesn’t have the demand you thought it did, you haven’t lost anything. You’ve gained clarity. You’ve eliminated a path that wouldn’t have worked. And now you can pivot faster. That’s not failure. That’s efficient decision-making.

Testing Founder-Offer Fit

Here’s something else most people don’t think about when it comes to validation. You’re not just testing if people want the topic. You’re testing if you actually want to facilitate this.

Because here’s what happens when you skip this step: you build a community around something you think you’re supposed to care about, and six months in, you realize you’re completely checked out. Or the community dynamic isn’t what you thought it would be. Or the questions people ask aren’t the ones you want to answer. And now you’re stuck running something you don’t actually enjoy.

So during your validation period, pay attention to your own energy. Do you look forward to the sessions? Or are you dreading them? Do the conversations energize you? Or do they deplete you? Those signals matter just as much as the engagement signals from your audience, because if you’re not genuinely excited about facilitating this community, it’s going to show. And people will feel it. And they won’t stay.

Validation isn’t just about market demand. It’s about founder-offer fit. And you can’t know that until you actually do it live.

What to Do Next

Pre-launch validation isn’t about being scared to commit. It’s not about lacking confidence in your idea. It’s not about needing permission from your audience. It’s about being strategic. It’s about respecting your time and energy enough to make sure you’re building something that will actually work before you invest everything into it.

You wouldn’t build a house without checking if the foundation is solid. You wouldn’t launch a product without testing if people will buy it. So why would you build a community without validating that people will actually show up and engage?

Testing isn’t a sign of weakness. It’s a sign of smart business. The best way to know if your community idea will work is to test it first. And challenges are one of the fastest, most effective ways to do that.

Stop guessing. Start validating.


Want to dive deeper into this topic? Join me over on the Community At Heart Substack, where we go behind the podcast episodes and continue the conversation.

Ready to build your community with support? Check out the coCreator Society at cocreatorsociety.com, where creative entrepreneurs stop doing business alone and finally get the collaboration and momentum they’ve been craving.

Get started with Circle today: https://try.circle.so/rachel

February 26, 2026

The Pre-Launch Validation Nobody Does (But Should)

grab your earbuds and get inspired!

+ show Comments

- Hide Comments

add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

so hot right now